Its been over a month that stories
of Hrithik-Kangana's alleged affair and break up stories are doing rounds..the
social media is too full of them..in fact they themselves are using social
media actively to make their point and now gone to the extent of releasing legal
statements against each other.. But my question is.. Is this really required..
are the fans interested in knowing so much about the personal lives of our film
stars or are the stars themselves making a mockery out of their life
situations.
Do they own a justification.. aren't
they normal humans too, can't they settle their own issues amicably without making
a hue and cry about it or is the media itself that makes the mountain out of a
molehill. I guess these questions will always remain unanswered...!!
"Hrithik Breaks His Silence and
Releases a Statement"- when was he quiet at the first place, innumerable
tweets have already given enough dope to media and public. And now following
the tit for tat policy, Kangana too releases a legal statement, meanwhile media
and public enjoy the overhyped squabble and gain some dope for masala posts for
their social and other media.
For those who have missed it.. here
it is.. excerpts from both statements
In his official statement sent
through his publicist, Hrithik Roshan has spoken about the fake email id
through which he alleges someone was impersonating him.
“Anything private that becomes
public gives rise to speculation and unnecessary controversies simply because
the general public are not privy to the whole truth.Out of respect for everyone
involved, I followed the legal path to resolve the matter in question so as to
keep it private. It was a breach of ethics to reveal the contents of a private
legal notice. Dignified silence is dignified up to a point, but there comes a
time when the silence needs to be broken to protect one’s name, family and
image.The crux of the matter is that the mail id hroshan@email.com does NOT
belong to me. I had filed a complaint in this regard with Mumbai Cyber Crime
cell on 12 December, 2014 when I learnt of this impersonator communicating with
said person. I have absolutely NO CONNECTION with this ID. The entire issue
stems from a case of identity theft which has carried over to me. My complaint
was reactivated on March 5, 2016 and the crime unit has made headway in
tracking this person down. Once that is done, the matter can be laid to rest.And
finally, I believe that mental health is a grave and crucial issue which merits
serious discussion. I would never address it flippantly nor use it as a
personal attack. Any allegation to the contrary is a misrepresentation of
facts. I was requested to keep silent and I did so for 2 years.”
Meanwhile, here's Kangana's entire
statement.
Mr. Hrithik’s statements made to the
media are nothing but efforts to gain public sympathy. He cannot wash his hands
off the matter now after having criminally threatened my client and having
intimidated her, without any provocation. He also cannot deny the fact that my
client never named him anywhere and it was he himself who claimed to be “Silly
Ex” in his notice. Besides his own acts of stating in the media that he would
rather ‘date a Pope’ gave enough fodder to the media to start speculating. How
can he blame my client for all his own acts of commissions and omissions.
Further, he should have refrained
from making absolutely false statements in his notice. He specifically claimed
that he does not know my client socially at all. If that were the truth, then
how was he attending my client’s private birthday party with his entire family
and my client was attending his party besides his sister’s and his father’s
birthday party as well. There is enough proof on public platform, which
sufficiently proves that Mr. Hrithik Roshan's is lying.
Pursuant to my counter-notice there
are now new claims that my client was not co-operating with the police to help
with investigation of Mr. Hrithik’s complaint. These claims are as false as his
other claims. The fact is that my client was never dealing with any imposter
and given the background of the matter, it is very lame on Mr. Hrithik’s part
to even suggest that. Besides my client was never ever asked for any
co-operation in the said matter by any person for obvious reasons. The fact
that Mr. Hrithik waited for seven month to lodge a complaint says it all. Now
pursuant to receipt of my notice the complaint is once again being looked into
by Mr. Hrithik Roshan, only as a face saving strategy.
It is also worthy to note that Mr.
Hrithik Roshan specifically claims to have received 50 unsolicited emails per
day from my client for about 601 days (as calculated from 24th May 2014 up to
16th February 2016). Accordingly, he should have received more than 30,000
(thirty thousand) emails from my client as against his own alleged claim of
receiving only 1,439 emails from my client during the said period. This shows
that there is non application of mind even while making allegations. At least
make efforts to do the calculations. Besides if Mr. Hrithik Roshan was really
receiving unsolicited emails from my client then why did he not prudently block
my client and went on receiving my client’s emails for such a long time. The
answer is obvious.
His own actions speak a lot and I
need not say more on behalf of my client Ms. kangana Ranaut. Most importantly I
would like to point out that at least Mr. Hrithik Roshan should have bothered
to ensure that he has a good reason to send a Legal Notice to my client. However
as expected the notice is absolutely baseless, unsubstantiated, unwarranted and
uncalled for. There is not even a case of defamation made out against my client
and he is issuing a Notice for defamation without application of mind.
He needs to immediately realise that
my client Ms. Kangana Ranaut does not need Mr. Hrithik Roshan’s name to garner
publicity or attention, as she is a renowned public figure herself.
No comments:
Post a Comment